Сохрани и опубликуйсвоё исследование
Проверь и подтвердиоригинальность работы
О проекте | Cоглашение | Партнёры
The multiformity of the "observer" as the pinnacle of concentration.
The two great tendencies of the Universe.
Скачать - 0 байт
Enter the password to open this PDF file:
IskandarAsadullaev (March, 2016);
The multiformity of the "observer" as the pinnacle of concentration.
The two great tendencies of the Universe.
The fantasy is sometimes in advance of scientific discoveries. As the same
thing took place with a hyperboloid of Engineer Garin, so I suppose it may happen
with Stanislaw Lem’s Solaris or something like that. An artificial decrease of the
search of planets similar to the planet Earth is explained by the fact that over the
last several decades it was expected to find something or someone like the person
(an observer) with a diverse number of modifications. That was very well reflected
in a variety of fantastic monster characters depicted in the movies, but still
physically similar to a person, his vicious and wicked modification. The search for
life in the universe is extremely lent out. People have searched for planets similar
to oursby climate, geology, atmosphere and etc. But we will try to show the
"observer" (scientists use this name for “homo sapience” in physics and
astrophysics) on a multi-valued basis, as well as we turn to such a foundation of a
person, as the concentration.
The speech here is about two great tendencies of the universe –
decentralization (entropy, the expansion of the universe, and etc.) and
centralization or concentration. It may seem that we are taking a step towards
religion, but that is only at first sight. From the very beginning it is necessary to
mention that all further judgments are based on the recognition of the fact that
material and ideal are considered as attributes of the matter –on the unity of
determinate and ideal beingwhich do not reproduce each other, but in the rest are
tend to be, at times, the primary or, sometimes, the secondary in relation towards
each other by its influence1.
Fromourviewpoint, the mind, the observer are not connected strictly to the
person, they are not only a function of the individual and society - social form of
1Asadullaev I.KNew Materialism // Being –the symphony of dissonance. – Dushanbe: AR-graph, 2014.
the development of the reality. A human being is merely one of the forms of the
"observer" in the universe. In other wordsa human is one of the numerous
universal concentrationsof the ideal as an attribute of matter. It is accompanied by
a limited concentration of material - determinate being. Let’s consider, first of all,
for this purpose one of the two global tendencies in the universe - the
concentration, along with decentralization.
The concentration is diverse and that occurs very well in formation of stars
and galaxies, matter and fields, black holes, micro particles, macrocosm and mega
world. Time and space, the biosphere and the human world are subjected to it. The
speech is essentially about the fact that different foundations and forms within their
development end up to single results.
Jens Bjerre’s notices are remarkable in this case: "If we could see, as if in a
magic binoculars, the entire history of the Earth, compressed and squeezed into the
framework of one year, then it would turn out like this:
For the first time, in November the simplest forms of life appear – amoeba,
lizards, mushrooms. In mid-December there appear giant animals, and a quarter of
an hour before the New Year, at about 23.45 at the New Year’sNight, the first
person comes up to the stage. The whole period of our era takes only the very last
minute of the outgoing year ... ... sixty seconds…"2.Jens Bjerre draws attention to
the time compression of innovations on the Earth. Theauthorpointsout at a little
above that: "In order to take a glance of humanity and fauna of our planet, let's see
how the Earth had been evolving.
More than three billion years ago a glowing clod, rushing in interplanetary
Twobillionyearsago. The clod gradually gets colder. The steam wandering in
the atmosphere converts into water. Oceans start to appear.
(Jens Bjerre. The lost world of Kalahari .Print house: M., Mysl, 1964, chapter two, http://rgosib.ru/book/kniga/133.htm)
One billion years ago. In the process of chemical exchange protoplasm is
born which promotes theemergence of the first living beings and microorganisms
in the oceans.
500 million years ago. There appear the first species of the simplest cellular
animals, amoeba and algae in the oceans.
220 million years ago. There start to develop primitive plants on the Earth.
Some large animals which used to inhabit the oceans (amphibians), move to the
200 million years ago. There emerge huge reptiles, lizards and dinosaurs.
90 million years ago. Mammals appear.
70 million years ago. New animals and plants appear.
25 million years ago. Gigantic animalsextinct, but elephants and
rhinoceroses live. There are new forest beasts, bisons and big anthropoid apes.
A millionyearsago. Similar to humans apes settle in caves.
500,000 yearsago. Similar to humans apes take up a stone or a stick.
100 000 years ago.The Stone Age human beings come out. Theybegin to
learn to use fire.
50,000 years ago. There start to form various human races.
About 2,000 years ago. The era of the Christian chronology begins
15 years ago. Man subdues the atom energy.
One year ago. A man can destroy all flesh; he can launch artificial moons on
the orbits around the globe.
In the future.Peoplebringcosmic space under their control and land on the
The acceleration of the development or the concentration within time is
more important for us, rather than the details which were supplemented and
partially changed since Jens Bjerre’s book was released.
B.F. Porshnevalso paid a great attention to the time acceleration, pointing to
more and more shrinking existence time of social formations 3.
Porshnev B.F. Feudalism and the masses of people. – Moscow: “Nauka”, 1964.
The history of the nature and the earth is concentrated within time in terms
of the emergence of innovations, that is, the observer - a person is a pinnacle of
concentration in the aspect of Planet, as one of the two main tendencies: the
dispersion or deconcentration (entropy, the expansion of the Universe)and
concentration – negentropy, aromorphosis. Whatisthedifferenceof a person as an
First of all, by the fact that via the observer the matter accomplishes its
reflection – it refers to itself, that is essentially the transparency4 of the mater in the
process of cognition and self – cognition. It should be mentioned that all types of
the transparency are, ultimately, the transparency5of the mater for itself in various
localities and fragments.Thetransparencyis a global process, that is at the level of
life and a human being is, essentially, a developed, forward-looking reflex reflection. On the one hand the transparency turns out as a primitive reflection, on
the other–cognition and self – cognition of the matter in the form of the observer a person.
Theobservercomesout as a result of the implementation of the universal
tendency of the development concentration, the apex of which in the world is the
With the help of the force of his thought a man penetrates into the essence of
the world6,its structure, the nature of laws, changing the humanized nature
according to his standards - his "image." At the same time, the extraordinary
richness of the universe penetrates the human consciousness, and concentrates in it
in a perfect shape. Themattercreates a social form of motion and through
humanaction it creates the conditions under which it begins to concentrate itself in
perfect shape, i.e. locality tends to become universality, but it does not reach all its
infinity. Matter - the objective world tends to concentrate in the human mind in a
perfect shape. This tendency is mediated and determined by the necessary
emergence of the social form of the matter motion, the emergence of the creative
Ozhegov S.I. The Russian language dictionary.Edition 18 / Moscow“RusskiyYazik” 1986.– p 529.
Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel. The science of logics.Vol. 2 / Moscow: «Mysl», 1971. – p. 10.
Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel. The science of logics.Vol. 2 / Moscow: «Mysl», 1971. – p. 7.
activity of consciousness, creating reflection of the universality of the objective
It is a peculiar universal process of the concentration of the matter7, space
and time in the form of "otherness" (not in the Hegelian sense) in the human
consciousness. Withtheappearanceof a person in objective reality there emerge
new relations and manifestations of transparent and opaque. In our opinion, this is
not a fluctuation, not random and only the local process. If the anthropic principle
suggests non-randomness of the observer emergence, the occurrence of who is
commensurate with the fundamental constants of the universe, we should talk
about the proportionality of the universe and a new level of arising correlation
between transparency and opaque represented byman. Man is, perhaps, local in the
universe as not the only case of the origin of the mind (although this is not proven,
as it does not prove the opposite), but the process of the ideal concentrationof the
infinite wealth of the objective reality (universal concentration) in a person’s
conscious is not local, as well asthe formation of theideal - immaterial transparency is not local at a certain stage of the development of the matter8.
Man, it must be assumed, is one of the forms of embodiment of the
universality, generality, when both space and time, the objective reality tend to
concentrate in it in an ideal shape. Thisisjustone of the objectives mediatedby
theemergence of the social form of the matter motion. That is the exact thing
scientists are trying to discover at the present time with the help of telescopes and
universe.Theyaremerelytryingto find one of the universal concentrations in the
If the universal concentration cannot happen physically, energetically, in
another word, materially, it is supposed to happen in an ideal shape, and that is
objective. Inthisprocessof concentration of the universe there happens a kind of
"otherness" of its material concentration. That is, we can see the opposite massive
The Anthology of world philosophy In four volumes. . Vol. 1, part 1. / Moscow: «Mysl». – p 333.
«Philosophicissues», N/10, 2005, 116-129 pp.
tendencies. One of them is the increase of entropy and the expansion of the
universe. The other one – is the tendency of the material concentration in the form
of the formation of stars and galaxies, heavy elements, negentropy and one of its
peaks - the concentration of time and space in the development of biological life on
Earth and the humanity in all its manifestations (the acceleration of innovations in
the biosphere, the acceleration of historical time, urbanization, the concentration of
economic processes - globalization, the Internet, etc.)... The problem of isotropy
(uniformity) and anisotropy (heterogeneity) of the universe is adjacent to this
aspect, but it is more considered in a completely different key.
In addition to this, there appears a question: Are these opposites of
deconcentration (dispersal) and the concentration (centralization) equal in the
present time – in the synchronous aspect? The fact is that the matter is
heterogeneous and there are unequal, nonequivalent factors of interaction,
particularly in the biosphere, there are diverse organisms: some of them represent a
factor of the strong impact, the other ones - a factor of weak impact in the process
of confrontation and mutual absorption in the biosphere 9.
Iftheoppositesare identical, in the issue under the consideration, and in some
other sense, include the diversity, which was mentioned by us, that is still they are
eventually equal at present in the universe - in synchronous aspect, that means the
person must be one of the most important parts of the process of the concentration
in the universe. He is not alone in the universe and there exist some potent
tendencies of "anti-big-bang" – the most complex system of the world
concentration of the objective reality, including an integral part of the universal
process of the emergence of life and mind in the universe. Life as a concentration
does not only possess familiar physical and biochemical basis but also some other
forms, which do not narrow down to a human observer.
There turns out an interesting phenomenon: the observer as the pinnacle of
concentration possessesnumerous other forms of concentration on the way to
himself. Life on the Earth and the observer are just one of the universal perfect
Pierre Teilhard de Chardin. The Phenomenon of Man. – Moscow: «Nauka», 1987.
pinnacles in the universe. It is necessary to search for not only the similarity of life
in the vast space, but also alternativesof the universal material and ideal
Iftheoppositionsare not equal, that means the ideal form of the concentration
of the world in human consciousness is justa weak reaction of the dialectical world
on the entropy processes, extension, dispersion, and a man represents just a "poor
imitation" of the universal concentration –nonequivalent opposite reaction to the
ongoing theory of "first bang". In this case it is necessary to explorethe expansion
of the universe - deconcentration as the dominant universal process of the objective
reality accompanied by weak concentration, and we are dealing with a universal
asymmetry. Itmanifestsitselfin the transition from primary concentration in the
instant of the explosion "first-atom" to the dispersal of the universe. Or is it a kind
of symmetry, unfurled in time - in the diachronic aspect? All of these issues, if they
are appropriate, require an overall study, especially by physicists, mathematicians,
astrophysicists and philosophers.
Butifthereisan opposition which is equal to it and it currently manifests itself
in something else, so it is necessary to seek an answer to the question: what exactly
is identity of opposites manifested in, under their diversity? The speech here is not
merely about the concentration, but about a system of the universal concentration,
if there is one and it currently continues, as opposed to the theory of the "first
bang", entropy,and the expansion of the universe. Or the speech should be about
the universal process of the concentration in the form of pulsations of the Universe
in the future (?), or the idea that dialectics is not universal which we suppose is
completely absurd. If dialectics is universal, it is extremely sophisticated by its
peculiarity of infinite manifestations and we have to find answers to new questions.
The most important question is: what alternative forms of universal concentration
of the ideal (and possibly material) exist in objective reality? In other words, what
principally different life forms exist, in addition to the one we know?
We proceed from the unity of material and ideal as the matterattributes.The
transition from the singular state to the "fist gang" and the expanding universe
denies itself in the opposite tendencies of the material concentration and, along
with them, there occupies a special place and ideal concentration of the objective
reality in people’s consciousness - their special world. Here we may come to a
conclusion of "inclusion" of a human being in very large-scale processes of the
universe10. Ontheotherhand, the study of the categories of transparent and opaque
tends to the above mentioned idea, expressed by scientists on the basis of the
The observer represents the pinnacle of transparency of the matter in relation
to himself. Moreover, not only in the form of specific earthly life, but on the basis
of many fundamentally different foundations of the concentration.
At the confluence of the interaction of philosophy and other sciences there
Wehavementionedabove of the possible non-equivalence in the modern universe
dispersal tendencies (deconcentration) and the concentration (centralization) - the
global asymmetry. For instance, a famous British astrophysicist P. Davis notes that
"... the universe is asymmetrical and there is no significant amount of antisubstance. The universe was formed with a slight excess (about one billionth of a
proportion) of the substance, and it is this excess that emerged at the beginning of
the expansion influenced the fact of appearance of galaxies, and sentient beings"12.
This idea allows the possible nonequivalence, asymmetry and diversity of such
opposites as dispersal and concentration of the universe.
Theprocessofconcentrationis essentially a global process of transformation
of matter into a transparent process in relation to itself, and is not limited only to
the forms of life we are familiar with. Life is one of the forms of the universal
concentration of the ideal and transparency under the local concentration of
MoiseevN.N. Vernadskiy and the Modern Time. – Philosophic issues. 1994. №4. p. 13
BazhenovL.B. Aboutthestatusoftheanthropicprincipleincosmology //The universe, astronomy, philosophy.– The
printing house of Moscow University. 1988. - p.90
Paul Davis. The Accidental Universe. / Moscow: «Mir», 1985. – p. 125.
Transparency exists everywhere. At the level of inorganic nature, bios and
human beings transparency is an outstripping reflection, and at the level of a
human being - this is the cognition, the concentration peak, along with other forms
of universal concentrations. We cannot witness a fact without an idea. The
statement of a question of some alternative forms of the universal development
concentration may become the basis of the observer searches on fundamentally
The universal concentration of the ideal, accompanied by a limited
concentration of determinate being of the material as an attribute of the matterdoes
not only happen in relation to a human being. There may be other forms of the
concentration, when the ideal becomes universal at the local concentration of the
material, and the observer is not limited here only to human beings.
For many decades "the common sense" does not allow a "wacky idea" of the
existence of the ambiguousness principle in quantum mechanics, the unity of
subjective and objective, the unity of the microcosm and the observer. Some
people just believethat scientific studies are not adequate enough. However, the
aspect of the concentration research in the universe leads to the formulation of new
issues and quite reasonable wacky ideas.
According to the anthropic principle13the universe allows the emergence of
bios and a human being (the observer)14 exactly under such its dimensional
characters, but it, at the same time, allows the concentration pinnacles as one of the
two great development tendencies - dispersal (deconcentration) and centralization
(concentration). Theappearanceof a person (the observer) is more fundamental
phenomenon than it might seem while glancing at it as a lost fluctuation. This also
regards the pinnacle of other concentration forms.
The opposition of anthropic principle or universal anthropic principle/ the statement of a question of the existence
of philosophic categories of acceptability and unacceptability, uncertainty and certainty.Thestructureoftime.LOGOS
– 2010: The collection of scientific articles under the edition I. A. Vasilenko. – M.: the editorA.V. Vorobev, 2010. –
172 p. – p. 153-172. On the websites: “physics without mathematics” and “new physics theories”, the department of
sociology ofthe Moscow State University: “Pitirim Sorokin’s fund”. New philosophy categories and the philosophy
of politics / Dushanbe: «Donish», 2006.
Look up.: Martynov D. Y. The anthropic principle in astronomy and its philosophic significance // the universe,
astronomy, philosophy. – The printing house of Moscow University.1988. - p.63
Авторизуясь на сайте, Вы принимаете условия Пользовательского Соглашения.